Concerns
about stricter UK
regulations led Europe's biggest bank to launch a review into whether to move
elsewhere, with Hong Kong the most likely
option.
The
decision was seen as a vote of confidence for the UK .
In a
statement, HSBC said that London
had an "internationally respected regulatory framework and legal
system" and added that it also was "home to a large pool of highly
skilled, international talent".
It was
therefore "ideally positioned to be the home base for a global financial
institution such as HSBC".
Part of the
review was considering whether the increased regulation of the banking industry
in the UK
- in particular the increased tax burden - warranted moving elsewhere.
But in the
last Budget, the Chancellor George Osborne introduced a gradual reduction in
the bank levy on balance sheets - a move which particularly affected HSBC,
because of its large balance sheet.
In 2014 it
paid £750m of the £1.9bn raised by the government through that particular tax.
Analysis: Kamal Ahmed, economics editor
For HSBC
itself, the decision wasn't just about the tax environment in the UK .
There was
also the problem of the regulatory environment in China - with the central bank
causing nervousness among investors and volatility in the markets after
intervening in the stock and currency markets.
Poorer news
about the Chinese economy also focused minds at HSBC's Canary
Wharf headquarters in London 's docklands.
One
interesting point to make about the decision is that whatever fears HSBC has
about Britain possibly
leaving the European Union, London 's
attraction as a financial capital was more significant.
Which
raises a challenge for those who argue that businesses could quit the UK if Britain were to leave the EU.
Source: BBC
No comments:
Post a Comment