The
Security and Immigration Minister (James Brokenshire) today presented before
the House a Statement of Changes in
Immigration Rules which will implement restrictions
on the ability of those already present in the UK as a Tier 4 (Student) or Tier
1 (Post Study Work) migrant to make an in-country application for an extension
of stay as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur).
The Tier 1
(Entrepreneur) category is for those who wish to establish a genuine business
which will generate jobs in the UK .
It has, however, become clear that the majority of those applying in-country
for leave in the category are those who have come here for the purpose of study
and are making speculative or fraudulent applications simply to extend their
stay in the UK .
Checks against the tax records of those who have been granted
leave as entrepreneurs suggest that few have gone on to engage in genuine
entrepreneurial activity, and that a significant proportion have taken
employment in breach of their conditions, typically at low skill levels.
This shows that a robust response is required to protect the
integrity of the immigration system and to make clear that systematic abuse
will not be tolerated. The new restrictions on switching into the Tier 1
(Entrepreneur) category will apply whilst we carry out further investigations
into these abuses and review the route to ensure that it delivers its proper
purpose, which is to help foster growth and innovation. The changes will come
into force tomorrow, to guard against the possibility of any further intake of
speculative or fraudulent applications.
The Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) remains open. Those who already have
leave in the category will continue to be able to extend their stay. The new
restrictions will not apply to those qualifying on the basis of seed funding or
funding provided by another government department, nor, in the case of those
switching from the Tier 1 (Post Study Work) route, will they apply to those who
have already established a genuine business. Those who graduate here will
continue to be able to apply to extend their stay under the Tier 1 (Graduate
Entrepreneur) category, which is significantly undersubscribed. Those who have
a genuine intention of establishing a business here will also continue to be
able to apply from overseas.
In addition, this statement of changes to the Immigration Rules
will remove all tests provided by Cambridge International Examinations (CIE),
and specific tests provided by Cambridge English and Trinity College London
from the list of approved English tests. These changes are being made at the
providers’ requests.
The changes also add a new 12 month ‘mathematics teacher
exchange’ scheme to the Tier 5 (Government Authorised Exchange) route. This
scheme is aimed at sharing best practice in the teaching of mathematics in
schools across England and China ,
and supports the objectives of the Department for Education who will administer
and fund the scheme.
This statement of changes also contains amendments to align the
Immigration Rules on family and private life in Appendix FM and paragraphs
276ADE-276DH with the public interest considerations in section 117B of the
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 which apply to decisions engaging
the qualified right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 of
the European Convention on Human Rights. The changes also align the Immigration
Rules on family and private life in Part 13, which relate to foreign criminals,
with the public interest considerations in sections 117B and 117C of the 2002
Act. These considerations are inserted by section 19 of the Immigration Act
2014.
Section 19 gives the weight of primary legislation to
parliament’s view of what the public interest under Article 8 requires, in
particular in respect of controlling immigration to safeguard the UK ’s
economic well-being and in respect of preventing disorder or crime.
The statement of changes also contains amendments facilitating
the use of the non-suspensive appeals provision, inserted by section 17(3) of
the Immigration Act 2014. This provision allows the Secretary of State to
certify an appeal where an individual is liable to deportation when, despite
the appeals process not having been begun or not having been exhausted, removal
of a person to the country or territory to which they are proposed to be
removed, pending the outcome of an appeal in relation to their claim, would not
be unlawful under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, for example the
individual would not face a real risk of serious irreversible harm if removed.
No comments:
Post a Comment